Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa Lexa E LT 19
Spinning
3000x
86.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa Lexa E LT 19?
Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
