Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX
