Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
