Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
