Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Beastmaster
