Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight310g / 10.93oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 5000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin IXTREK 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Delphin IXTREK?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Delphin IXTREK 5000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
