Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Beastmaster edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Beastmaster and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Shimano Beastmaster
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
