Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (5.89 out of 10). While Shimano Catana FE 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
