Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Shimano Catana FE 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.0:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Catana FE 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
