Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a weight of 535g / 18,87oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Catana FE and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (8,5kg / 18,74lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
