Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
