Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
