Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
