Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
