Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
