Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
