Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX
