Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
