Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
