Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX stands out for a weight of 250g / 8,82oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
