Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €419.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (205g / 7,23oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
