Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 MXGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX clearly outshines Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
