Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X

Shimano FX
Spinning
46.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa GS LTD
Spinning
27.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.66 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €83.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/220
Conclusion
Both Shimano FX 1000 FCX and Daiwa GS LTD 3000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Shimano FX 1000 FCX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa GS LTD 3000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Daiwa GS LTD?
Shimano FX 1000 FCX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.5 out of 10 (225g / 7,94oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
