Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano FX and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
