Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
