Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
