Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
