Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a weight of 270g / 9,52oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
