Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 230g / 8,11oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X
