Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

47.70 out of 100

Value for money2 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano TLD II A

Multireels

88.50 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.4 out of 10

Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1

Maximum drag42kg / 92.59lbs

Weight1625g / 57.32oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €285.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size50 II LRSA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeLever drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.85 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano TLD II A?

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX

For a score of 5 out of 10 (3.5:1 / 1.4:1) in gear ratio, the reel leans towards power over speed, making it handy when you need that extra muscle during tough fights
Exceptional value at €285.33, this reel offers impressive performance for the price, making it a top pick for serious multireels anglers and pros