Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a total score of 7.38 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX
