Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
