Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Aero C5000X
