Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.03 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight290g / 10.23oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €60.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000XGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a weight of 265g / 9,35oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.