Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
