Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Stella FK and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
