Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Stradic FM and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
