Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag17kg / 37.48lbs
Weight2447g / 86.32oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50WAX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50WAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
- Scoring 8.93 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
