Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X offers a weight of 190g / 6,7oz, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin REDIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
