Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa TD Match
Feeder And Match
64.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €153.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa TD Match 4012X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Daiwa TD Match 4012X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa TD Match?
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa TD Match 4012X
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin HORNET 40X
