Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and total score (9.44 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
