Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.1:1) and the weight (180g / 6,35oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
