Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SHGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX offers a gear ratio of 6.1:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.8 out of 10 (6.1:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
