Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight246g / 8.68oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/350
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX edges out Delphin IXTREK 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Delphin IXTREK 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a ball bearings of 6+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Ultegra and Delphin IXTREK?
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin IXTREK 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
