Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 201A and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
