Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
