Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and durabilitymaximum drag. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 301A and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
