Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.4 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
