Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Cardiff 401A and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
