Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X

Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 2500 R and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
