Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sahara 4000 R and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
