Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.14 out of 10). While Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa RX LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X
