Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 180g / 6,35oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Exceler LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
